Law Ethics

Use three (3) of the ethical approaches to analyze the following scenario

1. Consequentialism: Is the act morally justified
2. Rule consequentialism: Following of rules that will normally
produce good consequences
3. Deontology: – Moral rules that must be followed,
regardless of circumstances
4. Principlism: – Applying set of prima facie principles
to an ethical dilemma
5. Intuition: – Gut feeling that something is right of
6. Hermeneutics: – Promotes listening and talking through
7. Casuistry: – Deal with one case at a time, then rely
on that case in other cases (precedent)
8. Feminist Ethics: – Ensuring that outcomes do not
disadvantage women
9. Ethics of Care: – Care as the core ethical value
10. Virtue Ethics: – Promotes development of good
characteristics that are seen to promote human
11. Relativism: Extreme No right or wrong answer, Moderate Nearly always a range of acceptable moral answers, we cannot choose between them

You are advising a company defending against a claim for sexual harassment brought by an employee who cannot afford a lawyer and so has brought the proceedings herself. It is clear from your investigations that the claim is justified and that a serious wrong has been done to the employee. However, you notice that, in the paperwork, the claimant has made a technical error on which the company could rely to make a legal defense. What do you do?

Write a thesis paragraph for your roadmap/overview.

Use the CREAC method to organize your response.

CREAC (Conclusion, Rule, Explanation of Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is a common approach to organizing analysis of a specific legal issue.

The Rule for this scenario will be the definition of the ethical approaches: See book terms above

The Explanation will be an explanation of the rule in your own words because there are no precedents for the ethical approaches.

find the cost of your paper