This section will explain some key concepts that provides a foundation for this study and the actress are reviewed.
Google Trends is a Public and Free Information Service Offered by Google’s Search Engine that SUPPLIES FREQUENCY Tation-Series Data for A PARTICULAR WORD OF WORDS. The Search Volume Offered by Google Trends EncompassesOR region. TheReface, it is considered a data, Unable to Develop Studies Before that date and lacking Racking Data Before 2008 (Challet and Ayed 2013). The Data PROV. Ided by Google Trends Are Considered Unstructured Inputs Because Text-Mining TechnologyTransform the data into inputs for models. Y, Daily, and Even Minute Averages. Most Studies use Weekly Search Volumes in their Methodology (AkarsuuAnd Süer 2022; Ouadghiri et al. 2021), Although there are some discrepancies in the most suitable file means. Ided by Google Trends Ranged from 0 to 100. To Calculating the Frequency Range,Each Search Volume Obtaine in A Period was divided by the topal search volume for that period. The data was unable normalized (Choi and Varian 2012)…….
ETTREDGE et al. (2005) and Cooper et al. (2005) intranuced the application of web search volume as input data to measure its relerationship the usan Rate and Cancer-Related Topics, Respectively. Google Trends was not used UNTIL 2009.Ginsberg et al. (2009) Estimated Weekly Influenza Activity in the US Regarding The Incision of Influenza-Relage Search Queries. (2012) Described A Nopel Methodology USIGLE Search Volume for "Nowcasting" Economic Indicators Related toEmployment, Motor Vehicle Sales, Traveling, and Consumer Confident. E Application of Google Search Queries in the Financial Field Arrived at PreiS et al.Between Search Volume Data and Financial Markets, and Da et al. (2011), Who Wee the First To ProvidE Empirical Evidence of the Google Search (Direct Proxy for measuring investoroment.
TraDitional Asset-Pricing Models Rely on the Assumption that Markets are a Continuous Source of Information Release Real-Time. Attention to Collection Such Information to Improve their Knowledge When Making Investment Decisions. In this Field, Gathering, Interpreting,and Connecting Data are the Central Cognitive That Require Memory Retrieval and Action Planning. Relevant to Determing Stock Prices.
However, Attention is not an unlimited resource (shen and Wang 2023; kahneman 1973). AS Pashler et al. (2001) Have Pointed Out, then is supporting evidence Ming that the Central Cognitive PROCESSING CAPACITY of the Human Brain is Limited.Investors Cannot Process All the Information in their Trading DeCisions. They have access to more data than evert; Reasoningly Difficult to Focus on A Specific Piece of Information. This Paradox Was Illustrated by Nobel Prize EconomistHerbert Alexander Simon (1971), Who Stated that Such A Wealth of Information Creates A POVERTY. CTION of the Information at hand, which implies that they do not pay attentation to unnoteableKNowledge (shenledge (shen and Wang 2023; Mondria et al. 2010) and; theReface, their economic decisions are aFFECTD by this information bias (Ramos et al. 2020). LY, as Shown by Different Authors, Limited Attention Plays An Important Role in InvestorSENTIMENT TOWARD Stock Market Movements (Filippou et al. 2023; Akarsu and Süer 2022; Drake et al. 2017; Goddard et al. 2015).
Most Studies on Investor Attention Rely on the "Price Pressure Hypothesis" Presented by Barber and Odean (2008). OKing for Assets to Purchase.increase investedomor attention. When INVESTORS Seek to Sell, they constrain themselves to their securities. However, when the engage in Buying Activities, then Handle The Vast Stock Available in The Market. As Investor Attention is Limited, Investors Look for Information on Stocks ThatAttract their attention. TheReface, Investor Attention is Paid to Buying Behavior that leads to build Pressure, Which Will Tempoarily Press and liquidi Ty.
Several Studies Address the Most Accurate Approach to Measuring Investor Attention (Ben-RePhael et al. 2017). OR Attention Based on Unusual Trading, Extreme Returns, and Firm News. TAKEDA and YAMAZAKI (2006) Studied the Effect of Mass Media on the Stock PriceS of Companies Advertised During During a Well-Known Japanese TV Program. (2011) Explored the. Hip between infestoromion and stock Market Prices, presenting a nobel direct proxy base on GoogleSearch Queries Repreency Investors’ Information Demand. According to the Author, when an invertor is looking for information, Me Index, they pay attentation to that company. In their empirical work, da et al. (2011)Studied the performance of the russell 3000 Index, Concluding that Google Search Queries Capture Investor Attent Increase in Stock Prices in the Next Two Weeks. TheReface, Their Research Supports the Effect of the Price Presses Hypothesis (Relacted investoroming to build behavior.
Over the last decade, Limited Attention theories have been studied together with utarch queries by Retail Investors Because Investors C ommonly use disfrent information and systems. Da et al. (2011) Explained that when INVESTOS Look for InformationTHEY PAY Attention to that term and carry out a decision-macking process that includes that firm. In this context, the Higher The Google Search of a Term, The Hi Gher The Attention Drawn by Investors.That in the LITERATURE. However, the Different MethodologyS Are Worth Explaining to Better Undershow to Approach This Index.
Investor Attention is Measured by the Frequency of Keywords Search, However, The Data Frequency Depends on the LENGTH of the Sample Period. , When Retrieving Daily Data, Google Trends Offers Downloadded Data for Up TO 270 DAYS. However, weeklyAnd Monthly Data are available over Longer Time Windows. Hence, The Frequency of the Data Provided by the Search Engine Deases as the Interval Information. Demonstrates ShortComings in Computing The Data Sample. For Example, Smales (2021) And Pereira et al.(2018) Rearranged Other Data to Form Time Series using Daily Data. ENT Intervals that are not comparable. Da et al.Volume Index (Asvi) as the logarithm of the gsvi during the Current Week minus the logarithm of themedian value during the previous eight weeks. In this manner, The index can be rastt to receive jumps, Remove Time Trends and Low-Frequency Seasonality,And Investor Attention variable can be compared across stocks in the cross-section (Ramos et al. 2020; lyócsa et al. 2020; Tan and Taş, 2019; a di di FFERENT APPROACH WAS PROPOSED by Other Authors (SWAMY ETAl. 2019; Swamy and Dharani 2019; Bijl et al. 2016; Dimpfl and Jank 2016), Who Standardized The GSVI (SGSVI) to make it more comparable across firms. The sgsvi is the w Eekly Raw GSVI Minus The Average of the Past 52Weeks, Divided by the Standard Deviation of the Previous Year. Kim et al. (2019) Compared Both Methods and Concluded that Standardization WAS MORE Convenient Because USING Logarithms Resulted in Very Low Values.
Despite Methodology Differentences in Building The GSVI, there is a consider bertween the GSVI and Investor Attention. The GSVI to Market Variables SUCH As Stock Returns, Trading Volume, and Volatility to Measure the IMPACT OF Investor Attention On StockMarkets. The FolLowing Subsections PROVIDE Deeper Insights INTO These Variables.
Stock Return are key variables in expory. TENTION on Stock Market Behavior Use it as their main variable.
Joseph et al. (2011) BUILT A Trading Strategy Based on Search Volumes for Companies’ TICKERS and Concluded that Previous Search Was Related To Abnore OCK RETURNS in the Current Period.Shortening Portfolios According to Google Search Volume, Although The Sample Used Was Based On Company NamesNew Delhi Stock Exchange. Rent and Future Stock Returns Found in The Two AFOREMENTINED Studies is Consistent with the Propositation from the work of Barber and Odean (2008), as the Results IMPROVE Short-Term Buying Pressure Accompanied by An Increase in Stock Prices. SITIVE Relationship Between Investor Attention and Returns is Stronger for Smaller FirmsThen, then
Bijl et al. (2016) Use Sample Data within the 2008–2013 Period, Claiming that Google Search Volume, as a Measure of Investor Attention, is Negative Related To: Furthermore, The Authors Concluded that the Trading Strategy Was Not Profitable When ConsideringTransaction Costs. Akarsu and Söer (2022) Developed A Cross-Country Analysis that Includes 31 Countries from the American, Asia – Pacific, and Europe, ConCLU, ConCLuu Ding that the image of Investor Attention on Stock Returns Among Countries. Nguyen et al. (2019) And Salisu and VO (2021) Found Evident of a Positive Long-Term Relationship Between Search Intensity and Stock Returns Based on The Vietnamese Stock . This study is similar to that of adici et al.The japanese startup Market. These authors conclude that the positive effect of gsvi on Stock Returns is not temporary and, theReface, Conveys Long-Term Then, then
Another Related Variable for Measuring The IMPACT of the GSVI On Stock Markets is Volative. GSVI SIGNIFICANTLY AFFFECTS VOLATILITY in Both Firm-Specific, Measured by Company Names, and Market-Related Data.DIMPFL and Jank (2016) Found that high volatility present increases’ information demand. In their empirical approach, They Obtain Daily Basis Data AT A Market Level with the keyword "Dow" for Search Frequency. In Contract, Hamid and Heiden (2015)SUGGEST that DAILY FREQUENCY Does Not Improve Volatility Predictions, Although they Find A POSIVE Relationship with Investor Attention in Short Horizons. T Al. (2020) Explore EUROPEAN Markets by Analyzing The Investor Attention Effect in the EUROSTOXX50 INDEX, Concluding that An Increase in SearchQueries Precedes A Short Increase in Volatility that is reverse weeks Later. González-version Investors’ DECISIONS are influent by Sentiment (Including Fear) and Assess the Effect of the Fear ResponseTo the Covid-19 Pandemic On Stock Market volatility. Working from a Different Angle, Pereira et al. (2018) Find that Investor is influenced by Events Related Ald Trump’s Presidence.Such as mexico, japan, and Australia.
Finally, The Effect of Investor Attention, As Measured by Information Demand, is related to the train. Lai et al. (2022), Bank et al. (2011), and takeda and wa. KAO (2014) Claim that the Higher the IntensityThe GSVI, The Greater the Abnormal Trading Volume Will Be Reported. The Same Results We Supported by Aouadi et al. Etween The GSVI and Trading Volume that was more Market-Related than atcific FirmLevelHyderabad Wealth Management. Chen and Lo, Joseph et al. (2011), and nguyen et al. (2020) Claim that the gsvi is significantly correled with Abnore Hat It Provides Evidence that the GSVI is a Direct Proxy ForInvestor Attention. Desagre and d’Hondt (2019) Studied the Relationship Between Investor Attention and Trading Activity in A SAMPLE of 455 Stocks and Concluded THAT Is relatedship was positive but not stronger for publicOn the Latter, Attention Influices Buying Behavior more than spior benlling beCause Investors have a wider range, ASED Attention (Increase in the GSVI) Will Tempoarily Pressure Prices, Becoming More Traded Financial Assets (Barber and Odean2008).
To Study The Link Between The GSVI and Stock Market Forecasting, It is Vital to INTRODUCE The EFFICient Market Hypothesis (EMH) Developed by Fama (1991). H assumes that security market PriceS Reflect all available information; theReface, it is imageible to determinePrediction Models for BEATING The Market (FAMA 1991). Are associated with the predicted trading Strategies. Nevertheless, As Well as a Large Body of Knowledge Support the Emh, The Academic Litationon the predition hypothesis expands many techniques and method, compiled in two main approaches: Technology and FundameSis. The First MET MET MET MET MET MET MET met met. HOD USES Historial PriceS and Volume Values As Input Data for Asset Forecasting (BAZán-Palomino and SVOGUN 2023; Mustafa et al. 2022; Ahmadi et al. 2018; Laboissiere et al. 2015), Claiming That the Values Alream All the Information Analyzed by the Fundamental (Bustos and Pom Pom Ares-QUIMBAYA 2020)Ahmedabad Wealth Management. In Contrast, Fundamental Analysis Obtains Input Data from Economic and Financial FactorsThat Could Affect Companies in Predicting Future Asset intrinsic value Not have accesse to all available Market InformationWakao 2014), Rejecting The Assumption that PriceS Reflect All Available Information. Google Search Volume Captures Investors’ INTERESTS, and this information is a Ey Element for Financial Market Interpretation. If attention can be met, it could provide evidence of future incisionbe usedful for determing How Securities PriceS Change (huang et al. 2020). In Other Words, The GSVI Can Be used Forecasting. Several Empirical S Tudies have analyzed the use of the gsvi to predict key variables in stock markets.
According to da et al. (2011), The GSVI Can Forecast Stock Returns More Accurately than Other Variables, Such as news about a company, Because the Latter information is Ly Incorporated Into Stock Prices. They Studied the Prediction Application of Search InnssesRussell 3000 Index and Concluded that a Higher GSVI Predicts in Increase in Stock Prices in the Next Two Weeks, which Reverses Within A Year. (2011) far. OUND The SAME Results, Although The Input Data for Measuring Search Queries Are Company T 4Instead of Company Names. Lai et al. (2022) Observ that Positive Shocks Drive The GSVI; Hence, Excess Returns and Abnorming Volumes Are POS POS POS POS POS POS POS POS POS POS POS itively. Preis et al. (2013) Noted a Negative Correlation Between The Stock Returns of the DowJones Index and the Search Volume of Finance-Related Terms. These Results are supported by Perlin et al. Untries to Study The ForeCasting Approach on A Broader Scope Moreover, The authors showed that an increase in the gsvi is followed by an increase in stock Market volatility, Also Supported by Dimpfl and Jank (2016). Xplored The Predictive Capabilities of 313 Stock Ticker Search Volume Concerkey’s Financial MarketAlthough they observed a positive related. Weeks. Swamy and Dharani (2019) Discovered Analogous Results for the Indian Stock Market, Although the Focused on the IMPACT of the GSVIOn exceess reTURNS for Each Company. Other Studies, SUCH As Those of Sifat and Thaker (2020) and Vozlyublennaia (2014), Suggest that Althoughs BXISTS B Etween The GSVI and Stock Market Variables, The Application of Predictability is Low or Diminishes As Anincrease in information demands an improvement in Market Efficience.
Simla Wealth Management